Employer Midpoint Review

The midpoint review should take no more than five minutes and is your opportunity to offer your insights on the student’s progress.

Multiple Intelligences

In the Design program at Miami, we use a multiple intelligences model to guide design education. While applied skills like concept, aesthetic, usability, and production are important for designers to develop, modern designers are called upon to be much more than “producers.” The multiple intelligences model allows us to facilitate learning and measure growth in five different areas. Not everyone will be strong in every area, so instead of performance excellence, evidence of growth is the most important measure of success.

The five intelligences we assess are:
Practical, Analytical, Creative, Emotional, and Social (PACES). Learn more about the PACES model at the Design Miami Ohio website.

Think through the internship so far and complete this review of the individual’s performance. Please complete this review at the halfway point of the internship.

Employer Midpoint Review

Employer Midpoint Review

Responses will only be sent to the Internships Coordinator.

Name of student being reviewed. *

Adzaan MuqtadirAlissa CookAlissa MartinAndrew RogersBethany AnzaloneBreanna FreyBrittany MeisterClaire Saniel-BanreyCorinne BrownElizabeth TatlowEmily DrexeliusGrace BarrettKatrina KesslerKelsey HaverLauren DeitzerLia HergenrotherMadison RumschikMaggie WalkoffMarissa BartolottaMegan GoheenMeghan FosterMia Elizabeth RaleighNatalie FabbriSabrina Tinoco

Name of person completing review.

Title of person completing review.

Review of Performance

Think about how well the intern has performed in each of the following areas.

At what level has the individual applied design processes and produced outcomes within practical constraints? (e.g. on-time; following criteria or guidelines) *

Exemplary

Mastery

Developing

Beginning

Weak

At what level has the individual demonstrated relevant and accurate decision making for needs being addressed? (e.g. well-reasoned, justified designs; met stakeholder needs; used iteration to improve) *

Exemplary

Mastery

Developing

Beginning

Weak

At what level has the individual generated inventive and engaging outcomes? *

Exemplary

Mastery

Developing

Beginning

Weak

At what level has the individual accurately interpreted and expressed emotions that were appropriate for contexts? (e.g. design that captured the right emotions for the communication) *

Exemplary

Mastery

Developing

Beginning

Weak

At what level did the individual effectively engage and collaborate with others? *

Exemplary

Mastery

Developing

Beginning

Weak

If there's anything else you would like to share, feel free to do so here.

Δ